The Work of Gregory Clark and Jimmie Frise

Category: News Article Page 1 of 12

Plain Man

Premier Frost (r), meets with Col. George Weeks (l), Minister of Cuisine, and Duncan Sinclair.

By Gregory Clark, March 1, 1952.

To offset the rigors of civic life, Ontario’s Premier Frost1 holds sessions of his Kitchen Cabinet in a country cabin

An Old Ontario Expression

Premier and Mrs. Frost were in Port Arthur and Fort William not long ago in connection with a civic function. At the reception, a little old lady came up and, after a few minutes conversation, said to Gertrude Frost:

“Everybody told me how plain you were. I’m so happy to find it is true.”

Mrs. Frost patted her hairdo, and, at the first opportunity, looked at herself in her compact. For down around Lindsay, “plain” means only one thing. It means “homely.”

A few minutes later, the little old lady’s husband presented himself to Mrs. Frost.

“When my wife told me how plain you are,” he confided to the prime minister’s wife, “I knew you wouldn’t mind me coming up and speaking to you.”

It then dawned on Mrs. Frost, who is a highly personable woman, that in the Port Arthur and Fort William idiom, “plain” means “unaffected.”

With a large wicker market basket on his arm, the Prime Minister of Ontario2 reaches into his pocket for his keys.

The contents of the basket are discreetly hidden under a green cloth.

The prime minister is a big, strongly-built, long-legged man who walks with a barely perceptible limp. He is wearing old hunting clothes – canvas pants, a hip-length quilted hunting jacket, red-lined cap and lumberman’s rubbers. All nicely worn.

He finds the keys and selects one. With it, he opens the back door of the log cabin, set deep in the snow. It is not one of these fancy imitation log cabins; its timbers are more than a century old and they are chinked roughly, in the old fashion.

Inside, it is icy cold. But the prime minister lets out a hearty yell, and the two or three men coming through the snow behind him echo the cheer.

They are what is called his Kitchen Cabinet. They stamp into the room.

The log cabin consists of three rooms. In the far-end one are two double beds, with homemade quilts on them. This middle room we are in has three rocking chairs in it, a bench, a couple of less noble chairs and a Quebec heater3, which the prime minister immediately attacks, with kindling in his hand.

The other end room of cabin is the kitchen, small because of the largeness of the cook stove.

The No. 1 man of the prime minister’s Kitchen Cabinet the Minister, let us say, of Cuisine – is Col. George Weeks, manager of the Victoria and Grey Trust Co., of Lindsay, Ont., a 30-year chum of the prime minister. The others in the party might be Jack Deyell, who owns a printing business in Lindsay, or Judge McGibbon, or Ernie Fee, of Fee Motors, Ltd., Lindsay. They dump down their parcels and haversacks. The minister of cuisine takes the prime minister’s wicker basket off the table and carts it into the kitchen, along with his own packages. He whips off the green cloth.

Four steaks, maybe, or a large hunk of peameal bacon: chops maybe, thick; loaves of bread, pickles, potatoes, onions.

“Wow!” says the prime minister, looking in from the middle room, where the fire is now hustling.

“Aaaah!” says the minister of cuisine, unwrapping his own contribution to the kitchen table, which may be more steaks, or a hoarded roast of venison. And he attacks the big stove with kindling.

The weekly meeting of the Kitchen Cabinet is now in session. To this log cabin, with one or two or three of his oldest friends. Leslie Frost, landslide prime minister of Canada’s richest and most industrialized province, comes every weekend from the capital city of Toronto, where he has no home but only a hotel room.

You might suppose this log cabin is away in the wilderness. It is only 10 miles from Lindsay, which is the Frost home, and Lindsay is 78 miles from Toronto. Not merely is it only 10 miles from Lindsay, it is only 100 yards from the Frost summer cottage on Pleasant Point, Sturgeon Lake. Some miles away in the Haliburton backwoods, Leslie Frost found an old pioneer log house, built of broad-axed square timbers. He had the timbers brought down to the open field behind his summer home, and the cabin was erected. It is his hideaway. And unless the business before the Ontario Legislature is really desperate, every weekend of the year, session or no session, and no matter how cold the winter, Leslie Frost, in his fishing clothes or his hunting clothes, in season, beats it away from the great world in which, almost unwillingly but certainly without any great intention, he finds himself enormously involved.

Not every weekend does he take his friends. Often it is his wife, Gertrude, who goes with him to the sanctuary of the log cabin. Whatever it is that Frost has got which so attracted the Old Man Ontario spirit of the Ontario voters last November that they returned his government to power with the overwhelming majority of 81 seats out of the 92, it is here in the quiet that he keeps it alive and unimpaired.

And it was here, in one of the three big rocking chairs of the middle room, that I talked to him, sitting in his mother’s old rocker, in an attempt to get a sort of profile of this small-town lawyer who guides, if he does not indeed control, the destiny of an enormously wealthy and tremendously expanding industrial province.

In the first place. he is not a small-town lawyer. That is one of those handy newspaper phrases that are entirely misleading. More misleading though enthusiastic descriptions have been uttered of Leslie Frost than of most contemporary public men. They say he is a great, good-natured, easy-going character. But he can get as mad as a hornet. And no less easy-going man ever chased an elusive phrase through 40 pounds of legal volumes. He is an insatiably curious and tireless man.

As for being a small-town lawyer, he and his brother, the late Cecil Frost, KC, who was his partner in Lindsay ever since they graduated together from Osgoode Hall in 1921, were two of the best-known lawyers in Canada – in courts of all degrees, in city and town – and built up a law practice and an insurance business that was so lucrative that everybody in politics knows it was a great personal sacrifice for him to enter politics at all

Sitting there in his old hunting clothes in the big rocking chair, he nonetheless conveys the impression of all these very misapprehensions: he does seem like a big, easy-going, kindly country lawyer. He resembles physically and very remarkably the English actor, Michael Redgrave, whom I met last summer.

His speech is quiet and filled with plain English. It is full of such phrases as “You’re right!” and “That’s a fact!” or “Now, let’s see!”

He is no orator, no spellbinder, either on the platform, in the courtroom or in a log cabin. He has a habit of pausing abruptly in the midst of an easy and casual flow of words. He reflects. Like a hunter following a track, you see him scanning the ground. Then he proceeds with what he has to say.

And after a little while with Leslie Frost, the characteristic that you have been puzzling to find becomes suddenly clear.

He may be a lawyer, he may be a businessman, he may be a politician – but what he is, above everything, is a wise counsellor. It was in that character that he built up, with his brother, a prosperous legal practice in Lindsay. It was with that characteristic that he made himself countless personal friends in Lindsay and throughout the counties of Victoria and Haliburton, in all the little villages and hamlets with such endearing names as Manilla, Little Britain, Fingerboard, Coboconk, Omemee, Buckhorn, Janetville, Norland, Elsie.

He was 39 years old, and with no thought of public life in mind, when his reputation as a wise counsellor and the wide local popularity it had inspired, shoved him into an election in 1934. That was in the whoop and hurrah of the Hepburn era. Frost was beaten. But in 1939, he was elected. From his first entry into public life, he was earmarked for office. Though in the Opposition in 1939, he was delegated by George Drew, the Conservative leader, to be financial critic of the government. And when, in 1942, Drew formed a government, Leslie Frost was appointed provincial treasurer and minister of mines.

That was in the midst of war. But it was also, in some sense, the real beginning of that enormous industrial expansion of Ontario, caused by war production, which has not slackened since. And to get this man, rocking in a chair in a log cabin, into full focus, the simplest thing to do is to state in plain figures the rather staggering statistics of the money he as provincial treasurer, has had to find, account for, provide and spend in the 10 years he has been provincial treasurer, and the three years he has been prime minister.

This is what has happened in Ontario, in its expansion as an industrial province, since he took over the account books:

In the last year of the Hepburn regime, the budget showed Ontario’s expenditures for 1942 were $96,337,015.

Frost’s budgets show the subsequent provincial expenditures to have risen from $92,000,000, when he took over, to $250,000,000 last year! This year’s budget, to come down soon, will be bigger still.

How does all this spending jibe with the figure of that good gray character, Old Man Ontario? Since 2,000,000 of Ontario’s 4,500,000 people live on the land, and since a great many of the other 2,500,000 who live in communities are village and small-town people, how does it come about that the man who handles the spending of all that money was returned to power in a political landslide? Don’t the little people worry about money any more?

Well, in the nine years of Frost budgets, there never was one cent of deficit. Each year there was a surplus, ranging anywhere from $1,000,000 to $25,000,000.

And here, in a rocking chair in his old hunting coat, with the Quebec heater humming, sits the man who has to say “Yes” and “No.”

I had the budget statistics in my notebook as we talked. And I told him I was trying to rationalize them in terms of a small-town lawyer. Frost smiled and shoved his hunting cap back on his head, as though the room were getting warmer now.

“Well,” he said, “there were quite a few people elected besides me last November.”

Which is true. He has a fine company of men in his cabinet; and, because of his characteristic habit of consulting high, wide and handsome, has many a good adviser among the rank and file of the membership of the House. He sits in his cabinet as the chairman. And if he is a wise counsellor by nature, habit and training back in Lindsay. Little Britain, Omemee. Buckhorn and Fingerboard, it is not much of a move to become a wise councillor at the big table in Queen’s Park.

Besides which, of course, he has his Kitchen Cabinet. Every weekend.

“In 30 years,” says Col. George Weeks, who is the cook at the log cabin and a very gifted cook against whom even Mrs. Frost is not keen to compete – “in 30 years, there has never been a political gathering of any kind at that summer cottage or that log cabin. Now, mind you, I don’t say we don’t talk politics. But there has never been a gathering of politicians.”

In fact, it goes farther than that. With very few exceptions, Leslie Frost has never invited any of his political colleagues down to Pleasant Point. It is strictly a retreat, a hideaway from the big world. And on the couple of occasions on which big shots in the business or political world were so ill-advised as to come down uninvited and unheralded to the log cabin, just to “drop in” on Leslie Frost, they got what might be called a frosty reception. His cronies say that the premier never gets mad about big things but always about little things like that.

Two years ago. Premier Frost’s large, amiable imperturbability was broached by one of the more gadfly members of the Opposition in the Legislature, and he lost his temper in the sudden, spectacular fashion common to the imperturbable. The account of it made the headlines, of course. And a couple of days later, he got a personal note from the late Mackenzie King, perhaps one of the last such letters the old statesman wrote, in which he cautioned Frost against allowing anything to shake his temper, and to be sure to take plenty of relaxation away from the pressure of office. Premier Frost treasures that letter among his most precious possessions.

“As a matter of fact,” he admitted, in the old log cabin, “I have to confess I try to model my own political life on that of Sir John A. MacDonald and Mackenzie King. I have read all their speeches, studied their lives, to try to convert, into terms I can understand, their political attitudes to what is good for Canada and good for us all.”

Leslie Frost is 56 years old. He was born in Orillia, Ont. He and his brother, Cecil, who was a year and 10 months younger, went to World War I as lieutenants and came home captains, both badly wounded – Leslie with a severe hip injury that hospitalized him for 17 months. He and Cecil, most devoted brothers, went to Osgoode Hall, in Toronto to study law, and then bought a practice in Lindsay, a town not far from Orillia, in which they were on familiar ground.

They married sisters, the daughters of John Carew, MLA, of Lindsay. The Frost boys being the sons of “Daylight Bill” Frost, of Orillia, who held nearly all the elective offices in that municipality, there was consequently a fairly lively awareness of politics in the whole Frost-Carew family setup. Cecil became mayor of Lindsay and president of the Ontario Conservative Association. But Leslie was approaching middle age before he even thought of entering public life.

Leslie and Gertrude Frost, therefore, have no great pretensions about public life or politics. They have no children. They have never set up a home in Toronto, despite Frost’s 10 years of service as a cabinet minister and prime minister. They have a beautiful red brick house in Lindsay, a cottage down on Pleasant Point located exactly on the site of a former small settler’s cabin which, in 1921, the two young captains home from the wars rented and lived in, six months of the year, commuting each day by steamboat up to Lindsay, until they got their law and insurance business perking.

And they also have this log cabin in which the so-called small-town lawyer, who only gets mad at little things, can, each weekend, take wise counsel with himself, his wife and his old, old friends, so that, on Mondays, he can go back happy to his office as chief administrator of a $250,000,000-a-year enterprise – a province bounding ahead into an industrial destiny that beggars the dreams of only 10 years ago.

About the only thing Premier Frost didn’t like about last November’s election was that he missed the deer hunt.

“What kind of a deer hunter is he?” I asked one of his cronies.

“Awfff!” snorted his friend. “About the same as he is a fisherman.”

“And what’s that?” I asked.

“Instead of sitting still and fishing,” explained his chum, disgustedly, “he keeps saying, ‘Well, I think I’ll just row around that next point and see what’s beyond there…’ The man is desperately curious. Hunting, he’s always got to see over the next hill. I never saw such curiosity. Of course, he gets his deer, too.”

“And fish?” I queried.

“Oh sure,” admitted the friend. “That is, unless he comes across some old ruined log shanty, or hears of an Indian burial ground or something. The guy is a historian gone wrong.

There isn’t an old homestead, a pioneer family, a long-abandoned lumber camp or sawmill within miles and miles of Lindsay that Les Frost doesn’t know all about. He can give you the vital statistics, names, dates and every last pernicketty particular…”

I might conclude this sketch of Premier Frost with the remark that while I called uninvited at the log cabin on Pleasant Point, he did not get mad, but, on the other hand, offered me a lift back to Toronto in his car. He drove me right to my home, away across the other side of town, and then, at my invitation, came in and shook hands with my wife and daughter, just to show them what a big guy I am to have prime ministers trotting me around.


Editor’s Notes: This article appeared in Weekend Picture Magazine.

  1. Leslie Frost was Premier of Ontario from 1949 to 1961. He became Premier when we was elected leader of the Conservatives on May 4, 1949 after George Drew resigned to run for federal office. His first election as Premier occurred on November 22, 1951, a few months before this article. ↩︎
  2. The term “Prime Minister of Ontario” remained in colloquial use until the government of Bill Davis formally adopted the usage of the term Premier in 1971. ↩︎
  3. A Quebec heater historically refers to a type of tall, cylindrical, cast-iron wood or coal-burning stove used for heating homes and cabins.
    ↩︎

600 Students From ‘Varsity

February 27, 1915

By Gregory Clark, February 27, 1915.

One-Fifth of Enrolment Will Possibly Enlist in Canadian Expeditionary Forces.

Sturdy Patriotism of President Falconer Largely Responsible for Splendid Showing.

Not more than three months ago a good many men were looking slant-eyed at the University of Toronto, sniffing and snouting excitedly, and demanding the instant pulverization, of three very inoffensive professors who were so unfortunate as to be of German blood. Some members of the University’s own governing board publicly denounced the gentle and humane way in which the three professors were side-tracked, and demanded that the president accord them the very treatment the abhorred Germans would have doled out had the incident been in a German town. The result of that whole affair left a very unpleasant regard for the University in a section of the public mind. Varsity was quietly labeled as a secret hotbed of sedition, whose staff was in sympathy with Germany.

Let those who have been so loud in condemnation of the president and his “half measures” turn an eye on Varsity to-day. So far, one hundred and eighty-six students who have already enlisted have been granted their year – that is, marked as having passed the examinations they would have been trying this coming April. Eighty-six of these are with the first contingent and are now somewhere in the fighting zone. One thousand eight hundred students are enrolled in the Varsity Officers’ Training Corps and are drilling and attending military lectures. Each day sees another batch of men applying at the registrar’s office for permission to go to the front. With the closing of the term in April and with the opening of a training camp outside the city exclusively for Varsity men, the number of students actually going to the front will be, according to the word of a man intimately identified with the military movement at Varsity, not two hundred, as it now is, but six hundred, which is one-fifth of the male attendance at Varsity.

A Patriotic Centre

For the fact is, despite the snuffings and snoutings aforesaid, which were mostly on the part of those who fancied they could discredit certain members of the governing board of Varsity for political reasons, the University is one of the most practically patriotic centres in Canada. There is a daily practice of patriotism in drills and in attendance on dry technical lectures on military topics. What other body of men – banks, factories, shops, foundries -would so unanimously devote its leisure to drilling? And the drilling has not ceased with the novelty of it.

The handling of the military movement at Varsity is a delicate job. In a body of young men in which there is fraternity, rivalry, and ambition, it is no easy matter for one man to see another don a uniform and depart amid applause. The wonder is, indeed, that when one Varsity man went, the whole establishment didn’t go! There are, therefore, many sensitive young men at Varsity to-day. How to make it easy for the students to go and yet not force them into going, how to maintain the proper display of patriotism without making several thousand sensitive young fellows feel that they are committed, is the big problem at Varsity, the man who is handling it, and handling it successfully, is President Falconer.

Difficulties Increased

The difficulties facing President Falconer were tremendously increased by the German professors affair. War-time and an uncertain public temper: a deficit of $80,000, to be paid by a publicly controlled Government: and three Germans to be disposed of with the assistance of a warring board of governors! Of course, we now admit that the president took the only course in keeping with British fair play. But starting with such a muddle, the whole situation at ‘Varsity has been easy matter to handle, and to have got 200 away already and the whole institution maintaining a natural pitch of patriotic spirit, is the neatly diplomatic and tactfully developed situation to the credit of President Falconer.

It is planned to open a training camp exclusively for Varsity men after the close of the year, in May. It will be somewhere outside the city, possibly at Long Branch or Niagara. It will be conducted by the Officers’ Training Corps under Col. Lang. As many as want to go to the front can then go, and, considering the need in the Imperial army of men not only trained as officers, but as engineers, surveyors, linguists. doctors, and all branches of education ‘Varsity will no doubt see her opportunity.

The Faculty of Medicine has done most in recruiting. The Medical College, by no means the largest college. has sent over 60 students and members of the teaching staff. Arts have not done so well, considering their numbers. But the Arts enlistments will no doubt be swelled by Victoria College, which has taken the greatest interest in the military movement. The opening of the training camp will without doubt see 600 recruits from ‘Varsity.

Queer Professions Followed by Toronto Folks, Intellectual and Much Otherwise

Some Make a Living Writing Speeches for Other Men to Deliver-Some, Again, are Handwriting Experts and Tree Surgeons – Some Catch Rats, and Others Collect Cigar Stubs.

Mr. Arthur Hawkes enthusiastically writing other people’s speeches.

By Gregory Clark, January 10, 1914.

In a city the size of Toronto there are many queer trades and professions, practised by only a few men, and preserved from becoming common trades by the narrowness of their scope and the smallness of their patronage. Among the strangest are the professional speech writers, of whom several are said to have plenty to do in Toronto, whose names, however, are little known except to some of Toronto’s best after-dinner speakers, who jealously guard the names of their particular geniuses. Mr. Arthur Hawkes the well-known politician and journalist, used to be, in his young days in the Old Country, one of these professional speechwriters. It was fine, says Mr. Hawkes, as well as inspiring, to go to a meeting and hear some dignified town councillor spouting forth your own words, swinging his arms according to your bracketed directions, and to hear him thunderously applauded at the end, into the bargain.

Another queer profession, one that in Toronto is practised by only two men, is that of the handwriting expert. He figures in law suits, trials. and in the preparation of criminal cases. The two Toronto experts are W. H. Shaw, of the shorthand school, and O. B. Stanton, the Yonge street stationer.

Mr. Stanton, and his father before him, have figured in many a famous criminal case in Toronto. The method used in determining whether, say, a cheque is a forgery or not, is to have a photographic enlargement of cheque and of a sample of the genuine signature made, many sizes larger than ordinary writing. With past experience and training, the handwriting expert goes to the particular letters and particular curves, and angles of letters, and compares the cheque with the genuine sample. He knows certain rules, chiefly common rules of simple psychology, which show him where a man cannot disguise his writing and these rules he explains to judge or jury.

In Europe, in Paris, principally. the study of hand-writing in relation to crime is highly developed.

Tracing a letter to a particular typewriting machine, a thing that figures In some criminal cases, is one expert profession. But the papers and samples have to be sent to New York from Toronto in cases of extreme doubt.

Tree Surgery

Tree-Doctoring and tree surgery is practised by three or four firms in Toronto. In Queen’s Park subjects of tree surgery can be seen – grand old oaks, with the side of their trunks filled in with black asphalt. If a gentleman falls in love with a tree under which he romped as a boy on the home farm, and wishes to have it placed on his front lawn in the city, for his children to romp under, these firms will undertake to transplant it – any number of miles.

In connection with the detection of crime, there is the finger-print expert, only one of which works in Toronto Mr. Hugh Duncan, of the Detective Department. He blackens the convicts’ hands, takes prints of them on paper, and these are considerably enlarged into photographs. These are kept on file.

In case a finger print is found on paper or an article of furniture connected with a crime, it is moistened, powdered lightly, and pressed on to paper. If it corresponds with the suspect’s finger print, it is regarded as most damaging evidence by the police.

Autograph hunting as a profession is said to have its exponents in Toronto, although no explicit examples are to be had. An amusing case is that of a Frenchman, Ludovic Picard, who made a steady income out of autograph hunting for many years. His most successful coup was accomplished with a letter in which he posed as “one of the unappreciated who is meditating suicide, and seeks for counsel and aid in this hour of sore distress.” This effusion drew a number of celebrities, including Beranger and Heine1. Lacordaire sent ten closely written pages, which were promptly converted into cash. Dickens also fell a victim, and took trouble to answer in French. Eventually Picard was shown up in the press by Jules Sandeau, and had to seek another occupation.

Rat-Catching

In the lower stratum of society, in the “submerged tenth,” a great number of queer professions flourish, none queerer being that of the professional rat-catcher, or “rat-eater,” as the police call them. Every big establishment has to have the services of these quaint professors, modified pied pipers. Eaton’s, Simpson’s, and the St. Lawrence Market find them indispensable. At night-fall these “rat-eaters” enter the darkened edifices, and in those nooks and crannies where their professional knowledge directs them, they set traps and lay poison. They are paid prices, ranging from 1 to 5 cents, according to the anxiety of the proprietors, per rat head.

The Rat Killer.

The boot beggar’s queer trade borders close on vagrant crime or mendicancy. The boot-beggar calls at your door, a pitiable sight, with his toes protruding from dilapidated boots, and tearfully begs a pair of old boots. If you respond, as you are likely to do, he walks down the street to where his wife is standing, on the watch for a stray policeman, and hands her your boots to add to her already bulging apron-full. Detective William Wallace, of the Toronto staff, who is a devoted student of all these petty forms of crime and queer turns of human nature, says that the boot beggar averages 80 cents per pair for the old boots he gets for nothing, when, sold to the junk dealer.

Picking Up Cigar Butts

The city man who rises with the sun in the summer for the sake of health will often see a man much resembling the comic paper’s hobo, shambling along the streets picking up cigar-butts and cigarette ends. This is a profession, as they seldom smoke what they rescue from the gutter. Where the tobacco goes is a mystery to the police. But it is suspected that it goes whence it come back into the mouth of the smoker, in the form of a cheap cigar or cheap cigarette. These hoboes are “snipe-shooters” of the police lists.

The “finders” are closely allied to the “snipe shooters,” only they frequent the busy corners and fronts of hotels and theatres at daybreak; and carefully turn over the papers and rubbish in search of dropped coins and car tickets. It is surprising to learn from the police that these men “find” enough to make a living, miserable though it be.

The “pollackers” are other early birds, or early worms, as the case may be, who search through the garbage barrels of the city in search of tea-lead2, bottles, rags – all of which are merchandise in the eyes of the slum dwellers.

The Rag Picker.

A profession that has a slight following in Toronto is that of “sandwiching”- being a human advertising board. Stray vagrants from London, where the human back is considered a good advertising ground, sometimes offer their services to Toronto firms.


Editor’s Notes: This is one of Greg’s earliest credited works in the Star Weekly. Sometimes when he was first credited, it was as Gregg Clark, like in this one. I’m not sure if that was a typo or he wanted to be called that initially.

  1. It’s harder to guess who some of these early celebrities are, especially if he only gives single names, and does not mention the time period they were famous, since these ones might have been in the recent (for him) past. ↩︎
  2. Another mystery, I don’t know what this is. ↩︎

Coffee Houses as Saloon Substitutes in Toronto

This picture has nothing to do with the article, but it was on the same newspaper page and I thought it looked good.

Surveys Now Being Made of City to Determine Best Types of Social Meeting – Places to Take Place of Old “Poor Men’s Clubs” – To Use Old Barrooms?

Br Gregory Clark, December 27, 1919.

Toronto has had a happy old year, in which has come peace, and the marching back of tens of thousands of her sons, the overturning of the rickety political wagon and the final and irrevocable ousting of booze.

A fairly happy and industrious old year!

In the Happy New Year, which, out of old custom, is being predicted with Dickensian fervor these few days by one and all, such matters as prices, wages, the building of a new political bus, the embalming and final burial of the remains of Old Bill Booze, stand out as demanding some of the happy industry such as dispensed in 1919.

But one of the most interesting undertakings of the coming year is the discovery of a substitute for the bar, something to take the place of the saloon in the social arrangement, the provision of the “poor man’s club.”

And it speaks well for the powers that be that already the united churches of Canada, the Y.M.C.A., the Salvation Army, and other agencies vitally interested in the needs of man are all seriously bent to the task of finding a substitute for the bar.

When even the liquor interests reluctantly admitted that the bar-room was doomed as a social institution, everyone recognized that something had been taken away from a certain great class of our citizenship. There was some justice in the claim that the saloon was the “poor man’s club.” With its passing, the man who could not afford to belong to institutions for human intercourse such as clubs and societies, had to fall back on the pool rooms, bowling alleys, barber shops, and public meetings.

Home life has been stimulated. The married man who used to frequent his “club” down at the corner and commune with his fellows over a scuttle of beer, has found new pleasures in the company of his family.

Hundreds Hunt Companionship

But all men are not married. Hence the success of hundreds of piffling public meetings in the past year. Hence the hordes of young men aimlessly wandering about down town after business hours, seeking entertainment and accepting whatever chanceth.

Since the passing of the bar, movies, poolrooms, bowling alleys have met the social needs of men. The well-to-do still have their tea rooms, cosy and congenial, where they can sit and relax. But tea rooms are no places for the working man, with their atmosphere of gush and giggle, oolong and macaroons.

Can Toronto successfully operate coffee houses to take the place of the bar rooms?

Quiet, leisurely places where coffee, tea, sandwiches, etc., are sold at a modest price, where plain men can sit of an evening as long as they like, as our fathers did of old in the coffee houses of Britain, and as our American brethren are attempting to do across the border now.

The Interchurch Forward Movement is studying that question.

Rev. Peter Bryce is now making a social survey of Toronto, one object of which is the investigation of the social needs of every district of the city, and the discovery of what form the social and recreational centres should take.

The Y.M.C.A., which is now operating the Red Triangle Club1 at Queen and Victoria streets for returned soldiers, proposes to maintain the premises as a down-town social organization when, in due course, the military work comes to an end.

The Salvation Army has been operating its Soldiers’ Hostel in the old Krausman Hotel2 at King and Church streets for four years. Its military nature has been undergoing a gradual change, weaving itself back into the civic fabric. And Commissioner Richards of the Salvation Army is studying its development closely, with the idea of discovering the most complete form of social agency for the present day.

The time may not be far distant when many of the old saloons of Toronto may flourish again, not as fountains of evil, where homes were poisoned and lives withered, but as coffee houses where men can gather for the simple and ancient pleasure of being together.

Roosevelt Coffee Houses

In the United States this problem is receiving different treatments from different organizations.

The latest development is that undertaken by the three sons of Theodore Roosevelt. They are leading a movement for the re-establishment of the coffee house as it was before the advent of the saloon. For, three hundred years ago, saloons were unknown in Britain or the United States. There were taverns. But men gathered in coffee houses for relaxation and recreation, not in the gin mills. Coffee houses date back to the thirteenth century. Saloons were a modern development, the product of the Georgian era, the drunken era.

The first in the Roosevelt boys’ chain of coffee houses is on West Forty-fourth street, New York. It is a quiet, humble shop, formerly a barroom. It is filled with tables. Coffee, tea, milk, cheese sandwiches are sold. It is a sort of leisurely soda parlor. But there is none of the hustle and rush of a restaurant about it. It is designed for fellowship.

And it is not run for profit, but to be self-supporting only.

The survey of Toronto now being made by Rev. Peter Bryce is not a complete accounting of the entire area of the city, but covers a number of typical and representative districts.

The intimacy of the study of these districts, which is being made by professional sociologists can be judged by these headings, which direct the workers to the information required:

Total population of district, nationalities and numbers of each, principal occupation, special industrial groups in area, what changes in area in ten years; what educational institutions, what attendance; what churches in area, attendance, with charts and maps; what missions, Sunday schools, settlements, with attendance; what playgrounds, movies, theatres, poolrooms, bowling alleys; what places of evil influence. And the student of each district is to enquire into what policy or change of policy is required.

As to the Salvation Army, Commissioner Richards says:

“The Army that has taken over the lepers of Java, the Inebriates Island of New Zealand; which patrols the shores of Norway and Denmark for wrecked sailors, and has raised the Lord’s banner in every part of the world, will not fail to give Toronto just what it needs for the social welfare of its people.”


Editor’s Notes: The Toronto Star was editorially in favour of Prohibition, so Greg had to write the way he did about the evils of alcohol, though I don’t think he believed it personally.

  1. I mentioned this before, it was the club run by the YMCA for returning soldiers. ↩︎
  2. The Krausman Hotel was taken down in 1970. ↩︎

Canada Must Care Better for the Returned Soldiers

Things Have Greatly Improved of Late, But There Is Still Considerable Confusion as to Authority, and Our Heroes and Their Families Suffer – Suggestions as to Remedying Conditions.

By Gregory Clark, December 18, 1915.

Toronto, the city that Ottawa called “the place that put the kick in kick,” has already begun to speculate as to how long the present organization for the care of returned soldiers can last. That it fails utterly to recognize the tremendous proportions and the hidden dangers of the problem is evident from the fact that no permanent and far-reaching plans are being laid, even though the problem is already posed in no small figures. That the present organization is shifting of responsibility from one place to another until no responsibility remains is pitifully plain.

It is six months since the first of our heroes began return to us. Three of those six months were passed in what might be called indifference to the problem. Originally the returning men were landed at Halifax, lodged in a jail, given a typewritten sheet of flimsy paper that purported to be a discharge, and were so launched over the Dominion home. After a few weeks the Discharge Depot at Quebec began to deal exclusively with the men. It was hopelessly undermanned. What short-sighted, foolish, and ineffectual means were taken by the Discharge Depot to cope with the problem are well-known now that the tragedy, oft-repeated, of sick men being discharged and left to court death with their own devices.

The last three months have seen the awakening. These tales of woe, of consumptives discharged, of money promised but never coming, have been written up fully in the press, despite very plausible charges that the press was attempting to hamstring the Government.

Now, after six months of battle with the problem the soldier who returns has a much better and more considerate reception than his comrades who preceded him. When he lands at Halifax, instead of being lodged in Melville Prison or on the docks, he is taken by train to Quebec in the best of coaches, and three square meals. At Quebec a sufficiently increased staff of doctors meet him. If, like 75 per cent. of returned soldiers, he is in need of medical care, he is sent forward to a central convalescent home. In the past he would have been lodged in none too clean immigration sheds, taken before a medical board, given his discharge, and a sum of money, and tuned adrift. Now he travels with a party to the convalescent home. He is enrolled on the books, and allowed to go home for a few days. His money is forwarded to the divisional officers. Thus far all is ship-shape. He is the charge of a well-conducted system. He cannot, even if he will, go out and kill himself by superinducing pneumonia or tuberculosis.

Discharge Depot Regulations

These matters are very clearly dealt with in the regulations of the Discharge Depot at Ottawa, which are here given for the first time:

Class No. 1: Men who are cured and ready for discharge are given discharge with pay and arrears, also fifteen days advance pay, so as to enable them to procure a situation in civil life, and, if deemed necessary, one pair of boots and their choice of a civilian suit of clothes and overcoat or the regulation allowance of $13.00 for purchase of same.

“Class No. 2: Men suffering from complaints which will probably respond under treatment or who require time and rest to be restored to normal health; men in this class are privileged to go to a Military Hospital or Convalescent Home, or if the case appears to be one which could be so disposed of, will be permitted to return to their homes and families until formally discharged. They are entitled to pay and arrears to date and advance pay for one month; boots, if required, and their choice of either civilian clothes or an allowance of $13.00 for same, and are not given a Discharge Certificate, but instead, a descriptive certificate stating that the holder is in Class No. 2, and entitled to the privileges provided for in such class.

“Class No. 3: Men permanently disabled in such a way as to be not likely to be needing other treatment, such disability having been caused by military service. Men in this class are riven a Certificate with a description of the individual and stating that he is in Class No. 3. He is given pay and arrears to date, with advance pay for one month; pair of boots, if necessary, and is choice of civilian clothes or an allowance of $13.00 for same. In the case of the above class an advance in cash, not to exceed $20, will be paid to every man, and immediately upon departure of the men from Quebec, a cheque for a sum not exceeding $100.00 will be forwarded to the A.A.G.1 of the Division to which the man belongs issuable to him on reaching home, after his case has been dealt with by the Division authorities. Each man’s address and last pay certificate will be immediately forwarded from the Discharge Depot at Quebec to Ottawa, where a special branch has teen formed to handle all future, payments.”

Things are Better Now

The scores who returned before this new order of things have a terrible tale of suffering and neglect to tell. It is a joyful thing to be able to say that at last after months of neglect, these splendid fellows are being looked out for. Numbers of them have been taken into the military hospitals. The others, who are not so badly off in health, have received the back pay that has been so outrageously neglected.

But this is only the medical side that is so excellent. May it improve! May it continue the good work! And no doubt it will under the guidance of Lieut.-Col. Marlow, the A.D.M.S., whose ideas have been largely followed out in the recent reorganization of the system. It is proposed to institute a series of branch convalescent homes all over the Province. And a further improvement is that the Discharge Depot is to move over to Liverpool, and all the clerical work will be done on board ship, so that the returned men will have no heel-kicking to do around to do around Quebec.

The fault, however, lies in the fact that there is no central head, no single office or officer responsible for this great work that will be with us for a generation. The Military Hospitals Commission was appointed by the Government to deal with the problem generally. Then sub-commissions requested in the Province, and the Soldiers’ Aid Commission was appointed to deal with the problem generally. Then the municipalities were requested to do a little something, and the Mayor of this city appointed a Soldiers’ Welcome Committee, and a military secretary, who opened a special office in the City Hall where returned soldiers are directed.

A Confusion of Authorities

Thus, the Military Hospitals Commission wrote the returned soldiers for full particulars. The Soldiers’ Aid Commission wrote likewise and enclosed a blank form of questions to the number of dozens to be filled in. The city wrote to returned soldiers asking them to enrol on a list in the City Clerk’s office. Military Hospitals Commission has a local office.

From the Military Hospitals Commission, from just plain Militia Department, from the Pensions and Claims Board, and from the Paymaster-General, the returned soldier receives equally authoritative letters. When it comes to his writing, he has not the faintest idea to which he should refer. He is confused by the multiplicity of departments, the variety of authorities. It is an almost unheard of thing for a man to receive an answer to a letter within a week. And I have seen answers coming a month after the original letter was sent.

Such confusion must surely go. The duty of attacking and solving the problem is certainly the duty of the State. And the only solution can be in the formation of a distinct department, or at least a very distinct branch of the Militia Department, with powers over the pay, pensions, and medical departments. The longer we dawdle along under the present system and larger the problem becomes, the harder will it be to break away from it in time to avoid the great dangers and the grave injustices and cruelties that are in it.

No scattered commissions, not knowing what the other is doing, but a single, clearly defined department. permanent and fully manned, with its officers, in every city and town. The Pensions Board cannot deal with the problem. For it is vastly greater than mere pensioning. It is the reinstatement into civil life of those whom the State has removed from civil life. It is the fathering of those forever helpless in the nation’s name. It is the work of re-making as many as possible into contributors again to the nation’s life.

Permanent Jobs Wanted

The present system is so vain. The human element has gone out of it. Money is being sent, very late. Jobs are being got by the Provincial organization, the Soldiers’ Aid Commission. But what is a temporary job? The men must be re-made fit to go into a job permanently. Christmas mails are not forever. But remade muscles, remade lungs, built by a period of rest with a liberal allowance, and then a job that to the best of the commission’s and the soldier’s belief is a permanent job – these are different matters. The State must remake the man and then find him one job. If the commissions flutter about, getting job after job or giving money in place of lacking jobs to men, all will end in disillusionment, disgust, confusion.

Samples of the confusion arising out of too many authorities are not scarce. One man who was given subsistence for three. months was neglected for one month, left on his uppers, in fact. When he raised complaint the medical officers of the division came to him and said, “If you are too sick to work, then enter the convalescent home.”

The soldier had a wife and three children to support. He was doing it at the expense of his health, which was officially marked “unfit,” from wounds and trench exposure. The military officials, however, acting on the belief that it is safer to discount such cases as this as false, put it up to the man. He entered the home. His wife and three children went unprovided for. He had written to the Militia Department, to the Hospitals Commission, and to the Pay Department about his case. He did not receive money for his family until his story was printed in The Star Weekly and Daily Star.

In such a case as this the divisional authorities were in no way to blame. Not until the recent reorganization of the Discharge Depot were the divisions fully notified of their returned men.

Princess Pat a Peddler

Another case in point is that of a Princess Pat man whom I discovered peddling metal polish.

“Why are you doing that?” I asked.

“To make ends meet,” said this man who had taken part in some of the greatest battles around Ypres.

From his papers I learned that he had come home in October, was discharged, and was recommended to have $50 a month for three months. He received his $50 in October, but in November he only received $30. He wrote at once to Ottawa and received a reply from Mr. E. H. Scammell, secretary of the Military Hospitals Commission, explaining that $20 had been deducted on account of assigned pay for August and September, 1914, over a year ago, which had not hitherto been deducted from pay.

“I have a wife and six children. I unable even to do the lightest kind of work, but seeing that the officials do not consider these things and send me only $30 for the month, rent and all, I am obliged to peddle metal polish.”

“Man, didn’t you write back and explain at once?” I cried.

“Oh, yes,” said the soldier.

But he got no reply. Furthermore, he is of the opinion that there was no such thing as assigned pay that early in the war. It was, he believes, instituted later.

The Militia Department is overloaded, as it is, with the business of sending soldiers away from Canada. That department at least cannot be blamed for regarding the returned soldiers as of secondary importance There should be department to consider the returned soldier as of prime importance. It should take charge of every soldier the moment he is released from the hospital in England, and should thereafter never let go until the man is fit again, working at a job; or, if unfitted for life, pensioned and cared-for for life. There should be none of these horrible cases of neglect. There should never be a soldier peddling pencils because his money did not come from Ottawa. There should be no referring from one department to another, long, dreadful days to the returned men: light, busy, chatty, and talk full days for the officials.

The Soldier Who Spat Blood

I shall not soon forget an experience in this regard. At the street entrance of the Toronto office of one of the committees I met a returned soldier coming out.

“Hello, Bill!”

“Hello,” said Bill, the soldier with three wounds and destroyed lungs. “I’ve just been listening to a lady and gent telling me I’m no soldier. Why? Because I grew peeved when they said, for the fourth time in ten days, that they had written to Ottawa about my case. I want money! My kids need food! My God!”

And in a sort of fury he spat.

He spat blood!

When I reached the offices the soldier had come from I was assured that the soldier was a kicker and a drinker, and a greedy grasper-

“He is a hero, twice in action, thrice wounded, and now in our midst with tuberculosis on him,” I pointed out.

“Well, we’ve written to Ottawa and that’s all that can be done,” replied the officials.


Editor’s Notes: The Department of Soldiers’ Civil Re-establishment was only established in 1918 to handle the major problem of returning Canadian servicemen to civilian life after the First World War. In 1928 it merged with the Department of Health to form the Department of Pensions and National Health. The department of Veterans Affairs was not created until 1944.

  1. The Assistant Adjutant General. ↩︎

Rah! Rah! Rah! Three Cheers and – – a Pussy Cat!

October 3, 1925

By Gregory Clark, October 3, 1925.

War Cries, Battles and Other Disturbances at University of Toronto Now Regulated By Students’ Council – Ruffianism Abolished by Democratic Rule – Varsity Made Safe for Male Shingle and Marcelle

A terrible thing happened up on the campus of the University of Toronto the other day.

A student yelled “Yah!”

Right out loud.

It was a most disgusting exhibition. He was rough-looking sort of person. Large, bony, with big thick shoulders and thick legs.

The campus was crowded with students at the time, passing to and fro respectably, to their lectures. They were models of deportment. Most of them had the latest Oxford bags1 on, and nearly a hundred per cent. of them were wearing their hair long and slick2, in the very best manner. Contrasted with them stood this thick person of whom he are about to speak.

We will call him Buck.

Buck walked, perfectly composed, half-way across the campus. He was wearing a nondescript sort of blue suit the trousers of which clearly showed the shape of his legs. His cap disclosed the fact that his hair was cut short and bristly. On his face was a look of puzzlement.

Then Buck suddenly stopped in his track. Glared about him at the throng.

Then he reared up on his toes, threw his arms high in the air, and in a hoarse, deep, brutal voice yelled:

“Yah!”

Of course, after the students had picked themselves up off the ground, there was a momentary outbreak of protest and just indignation. But five members of the Students’ Administrative five members of the Students’ Administrative Council who were amongst those affected by this terrible breach of the peace were first to collect their senses and remind the throng of students of the amenities.

“Steady, fellow students!” cried out one of these officers. “Stand fast! Remember the constitution!”

And all the students quieted their voices and brushed off their Oxford bags in silence.

The officials of the Students’ Administrative Council gathered in a body near Buck, where he stood all alone amidst the throng, and then they approached him.

“Do you realize,” said the spokesman, standing forth a safe distance from Buck, they fearing for his sanity. “Do you realize that you are guilty of a grave offense against the laws, not to mention the honor and dignity of this great university of which we assume you are an undergraduate?”

Buck opened his large mouth, full of big, strong teeth, but then closed it without emitting another of those fearful yells.

“Presuming you to be a freshman and unacquainted with the regulations and interior administration of this great university, we ask you, will you come, without the use of force, to be instructed in the laws of this institution?”

“What if I don’t?” answered Buck in a loud voice.

“Then,” said the spokesman in a gentle and sweet voice of warning, “we will be obliged to call a policeman.”

Wild Buck Swiftly Tamed

So they led Buck, at a safe distance, all the throng following wonder and dismay, to the University College, where on the walls appeared this notice:

“Students who take part in disturbances or offensive contests unauthorized by the Students Council will be liable to a heavy fine not exceeding $50.003 each.

“R. Falconer, President.”

Buck read the above, removed his cap and reverently scratched his hard, bristly head.

Several dozens of the students were crowding around the councillors, crying out that their Oxford bags had been damaged by falling down when this frightful yell stunned them. “Compensation,” they kept crying. “Recompense for damages!” And one poor fellow showed how the yell had caused him to lose the $12 marcelle wave4 in his hair that he had got only last week.

But the councillors spoke to the mob of angry students and pleaded for Buck that he did not know the law. That was really, no excuse, of course. But still, there you are. Even in a self-governing country, there are those who escape the law.

Nothing like this has been heard of for several years. It is sincerely hoped that no further Bucks will appear amongst the student body of this great institution of learning. Buck has not been seen since the episode, and it is generally thought that he has left the university for some other, where his extraordinary qualities will not get him into trouble.

The incident demonstrates the most interesting fact about the University of Toronto. It is the most civilized university in the world. All the excesses that used to be linked with college students have been abolished. That roughness and intolerance that once upon a time shamed the fair name of learning has been dissipated. How? By the winning of self-government by the students.

While Sir Robert Falconer signs the warnings that are plenteously distributed all over the university buildings, the students themselves solemnly elect the Students’ Administrative Council, a body representing all colleges in the distinguished galaxy of colleges, and this council disciplines the students.

It shows the power of self-government to quell savage tribes. As you can see from the notice signed by Sir Robert, disturbances and offensive contests may still be held, but “with the authorization of the Students’ Council only.” You may apply to the council to hold an offensive contest. You may or may not get it, as the grave deliberations of the council may decree. In the old days of benevolent despotism, when the president ruled the roost, there were all kinds of terrible excesses. The world was certainly not safe for the cake-eater as it is to-day on ‘Varsity5 grounds. The students’ council has made the male shingle and the marcelle wave perfectly safe.

Old Relic of Barbarous Days

The last, dying gesture of old college rascaldom occurred four years ago, when a few returned soldiers, who had not had time to complete their university courses owing to an out break of ruffianism in which they felt impelled to take part, returned to their alma mamma to finish their education.

A relic of past barbarous days is an old ramshackle one-story wooden building hidden in behind New Trinity and south of the athletic stadium. This is called the old temporary gym. It is used for storage purposes and for holding. such “disturbances and offensive contests” as the students’ council may agree to on application and after due deliberation.

The sophomores of one of the faculties – we will spare their blushes by refraining from naming the faculty – got permission, just for old times’ sake, to hold an initiation of freshmen in this old building. Permission, sad to relate, was granted.

The freshmen of that year were invited to attend and be initiated.

Now these freshmen, amongst whom were a lot of rough, demobilized soldiers, had no idea of the great reform which had been effected in ‘Varsity. They thought an initiation was an initiation.

So the sophomores locked and barred themselves in the old Rough House, as the ramshackle building is called, and invited the freshmen to come in.

The freshmen attempted a frontal attack. Then some old soldier devised a gas attack. They made up some ammonia solution, climbed to the roof of the building and poured it through the holes in the roof.

They nearly killed the sophomores. A tragedy was narrowly averted. But the freshmen, so dim is the primitive mind, deemed it a victory. They gained entry into the Rough House, and all the sophomores went home to bed.

This incident, of course, is never referred to in polite academic circles. It is blamed on the war.

Three years ago the dental sophs took the freshmen and removed all their boots and threw them out an upper story window into College street.

The students’ council at once took action on this dastardly outbreak of hoodlumism, and fined every soph. the sum of $2.

Two years ago the medical faculty held a little celebration and then formed up and went on an entirely unauthorized parade down Yonge street. They raided the Italian fruit stores along the way and threw vegetables all about.

The students’ council at once called an emergency session and called the whole faculty before them. After a long and grave study of the crime, they fined the medical students who went in the parade three hundred dollars, collectively.

How do they collect the fines, you ask?

The students’ council does not permit a student to write his exams until he has paid the fine. It is quite simple.

When you consider the precedent set by the past, it is a wonderful thing the students have done in discipline by self-government. When you count up the suits of clothing destroyed even within the past fifteen years, it would fill the old Rough House.

Historic Cases of Ruffianism

 Here are certain historic cases.

The Model School Fence for example. Around the Model School on Gerrard street ran a drunken wooden fence that was unpainted, awry, staggered. For years the public and press cried out against it. Then one Hallowe’en, the students went down and held a bonfire. That was all.

The late Dr. Beattle Nesbitt was connected with an outrage that is remembered, even unto this day. A cow weighing fourteen hundred pounds, was somehow carried up the narrow stairway of the Old Grey Tower, and there left to moo and wail a greeting to the president the next morning. How they got it up was a mystery. For it took a gang of twenty workmen with block and tackle to get it down. It is the only time in the history of the place that a cow has ever been in the Old Grey Tower.

The picket fence around the athletic grounds, where the stadium now is, was burned year after year on Hallowe’en. It was one’ of the normal expenses of higher education, the renewing of that fence.

Theatre night used to be a night when everybody in Toronto used to try and get tickets to the show. The students’ atrocities in the theatre on these occasions used to be the talk of the town. Extraordinary sorts of confetti rained down from the gods. Strange musics afflicted the air.

But one night, the students poured flour down out of the gods. It was about this time Toronto began to feel that after all, there is nothing greater than property. The show chosen by the students for their theatre night was “The Middie Man” with E. S. Willard. When the riot and confusion was at its height, Mr. Willard rang down the curtain and came to the front.

“Ladies and gentlemen,” said he, “I have come a long way to make this my humble offering of the drama. When I learned that the students had chosen to attend my poor performance as their annual theatre night, I was greatly flattered. But it seems I have been guilty of misunderstanding. It appears that the students have come with the intention of presenting the entertainment, not I. I have rung down the curtain to allow these gentlemen to file out of the theatre, and as they pass the box office, each will receive his money back.”

Dead silence for a moment. Then a burst of tumultuous applause – from the gods. Mr. Willard had won. The students were perfectly quiet for the remainder of the show.

Theatre night now – if they still have theatre nights – they do not form up on the campus and march in a body. The students go individually, with their girls.

Students didn’t have girls in other days, They couldn’t be afforded.

There was at one time a chiropodist on College street whose sign was a huge human foot, gilded. A small select society was formed at the university which for the purpose of the moment called itself Order of the Boot. The large gilt foot disappeared never to be seen again of mortal eye. It decorated a room in a residence.

Signs are safe to-day. It was only 1910 that no student felt he was a student until sundry street car signs, “keep out,” “office of the president,’ and similar notices graced their studies. Recently, a stop and go signal, complete taken by students. The police sent word they wanted it back. They got it back.

Initiation Now Means Less

The Literary Society for long years annually elected its moral suasion committee from the largest and heftiest members of each party. At the Lit elections, these two moral suasion committees met to settle their differences by moral strength alone. Their fights were epics. Hoses usually played a large part. It was about the time that self government was imposed on the student body that the Literary Society voted to do away with the moral suasion committees as not being in keeping with the dignity of the society. Now they have got the dignity, at least.

Serenading the ladies residences, St. Margaret’s College and other girls schools within reach of the campus used to be the gallant way in which incognito gentlemen used to pay their respects to the girls. This had the advantage of being collegiate. To-day, the student in his wide pants and oiled hair takes his lady to a dance pavilion. Yelling Adeline under school windows however, was cheaper. A college education to-day is not so rough but more expensive than it used to be.

No Man’s Land is the more modern name for that bit of road that lies between the east door of the Engineering Building and the south door of the Medical Building. Across, this space of road, hundreds of fierce battles have been fought. For some reason, probably propinquity, engineers and doctors seem to hate each other. Between lectures, groups of Meds and Engineers would gather at their respective doors. Taunts would be hurled. Then insults. Depending on the weather and the barometric pressure, these rival groups would or would not go any further than taunts. When they did, woe betide the poor Arts men who might be in the neighborhood. Being known to neither side, both sides regarded them as enemies, in the fierce hand-to-hand that would follow. The writer had the distinction of having a thumb-full of shoe blacking smeared into his right eye by the eminent school battler. Bull Ritchie who weighed, dry, nigh unto three hundred pounds. And the writer started out merely as spectator, Arts.

When these battles started, all yearly differences and antipathies were wiped out. For example, it might be School Freshmen and Meds third year that were engaged. But no sooner did battle engage than the roars and groans of the battlers would be heard in lecture rooms and corridors within the separate strongholds. And out would rush school men of all years to the side of their detested Freshmen, and Meds Freshmen would with swelling pride come to the defense of their conceited Third Years men.

And the late Dean Galbraith himself would have to come out, armed with a hose, perhaps, to put an end to the little difference.

A Freshman used to be an object of intense physical repugnance to his elders. The only parallel is the feeling in a small boy’s soul when a new baby arrives in the house. No Freshman could be allowed to join the sacred circle without having a few mushings to indicate to him his physical deficiencies. For a university is a place of the intellect.

All this is gone. The parable of our good simple friend Buck and his indiscreet “Yah” illustrates what self government can do to a wild people.

If Buck yells “Yah” a second time, he is likely to be fined fifty dollars by a grave assembly of his peers.

Initiation, too, has fallen upon materialistic times. Initiation means initiation fees.

The dollar has tamed Varsity.


Editor’s Notes:

  1. Oxford Bags were very baggy trousers popular with male students at the time. ↩︎
  2. Slicked back hair using pomade or other oils was also the style at the time. ↩︎
  3. $50 in 1925 would be $915 in 2025. ↩︎
  4. On the subject of hair, Marcel waves were more common on women, but some men had them too. ↩︎
  5. Varsity was a generic term used at the time for the University of Toronto. ↩︎

After The War What Of Balkans?

By Gregory Clark, September 26, 1914.

Toronto Archimandrate1 Says Bulgarians Are Looking to Great Britain to Save Independence Of the Small Nations From Victorious Russia – Bulgaria a Democratic Nation.

If the great war goes as it should go – in favor of the allies, a problem as great, if not greater than the struggle itself, will arise out of that much-troubled and troublous region, the Balkans. If the Germans are defeated, Austria will have to give back the territory it has taken from the Balkan States, and Russia’s insistent demands for a Mediterranean port may have to be accorded more than the usual attention they have had in the past.

The gravity of the situation may be gathered from the explanation of it given by the Archimandrate Theophilact, the Greek Orthodox priest-missionary for Toronto and the district about it.

“The feeling in the Balkans,” said the Archimandrate, “is first, pro-Russian, and second, pro-British. Russia comes first, because of the ties of Slav blood. Although there had been, previous to the war, some hard feeling between the Balkan States, it took but little time for them to agree on friendly relations with the allies, though menaced by Austria on their borders.”

“The complexity of the situation does not arise, however, until the issues of the war are considered. Bulgaria is the most important State, because of its progressiveness and its firm, immoveable policies. Now, Bulgaria has set forth these two issues:

“The powers must agree to the revision of the Bucharest Treaty, must agree to the formation of a Balkan League, giving Macedonia to Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina to Servia, Transylvania to Roumania, and Epeira to Greece; thus setting the States of the league on their old and sound basis.”

“Or, as the second issue, if the Bucharest Treaty is not revised, and there is no Balkan League, then Bulgaria, as the pivotal state, must form a strong alliance with those powers that most favor her national aspirations. And those powers, there is little doubt, will be Britain and France.”

“For, although the Balkans are now pro-Russian first of all, they see quite well the menace of Russia – the menace of a conquering Russia, empowered to make great demands, one of which may be an extension of her territory southward through the Balkans.”

They Look to Britain

To Britain, then, who does not want our territories, but who does want our independence, to checkmate the moves of other world powers, we look for our guarantee of liberty. In fact, we place utter confidence in Britain, because we feel sure Britain could do nothing else but guard our independence, to protect her in the Suez.

“We feel that while Britain is helping us, she is helping herself. Good! We say! That smacks of plain-dealing, of honesty. But Russia whispers to us of Pan-Slavism. And Germany and Austria pats us as a man pats a horse on the back preparatory to straddling it!

“We Bulgarians are what might be called realists! The business-like attitude of Britain appeals to us. Race ideals and race movements do not sway us. We are looking for real, material things. After centuries of being battered and torn and our garments apportioned, we cannot be blamed for seeking material good.

“And so,” said the archimandrate, “on my last visit to Sofia, I found English ideas uppermost. English is the principal study in the colleges. England’s history and politics usurp the public attention. I found myself in general respect because I spoke English. I had the entree to the best circles.

“It is somewhat disconcerting to me to see the extent of the ignorance in Europe and America regarding Bulgaria. Of course, the ‘atrocities’ printed largely during the Balkan wars were shown to be ignorant lies by the Carnegie report. But it is not generally known that women’s suffrage has a stronghold in Bulgaria, that not even the most inaccessible hamlet is without a school, that elections are as fair as in England-that the whole tone is utterly democratic.

Governed by the People

Why, the Greek Church in Bulgaria is governed by the people. From priest to bishop, the clergy is elected. For instance, I studied for the priesthood, and then, upon qualifying, I offered myself as candidate for one of the towns or churches. There is an election every four years. Bishops and more famous priests, however, are usually elected for life.

“In the Parliament of 205 deputies, 37 are Social Democrats, 14 are democrats, 47 are agriculturals, or representatives of the farmers.

“Our literature has only been on a firm foundation for about 100 years. Turkish influences were too powerful against it in preceding centuries. Even now our literature is profoundly influenced by Russian and French literature.”


Editor’s Note: This is just a news story by Greg after the first world war started, and before he signed up.

  1. The Archimandrite is a leader in the Orthodox Church. ↩︎

He Was a Romantic

By Gregory Clark, August 12, 1950.

When Gregory Clark’s father, the late Joe Clark, was demon bowler of the Parkdale Cricket Club, Toronto, the team went to Berlin, Ont., for a match in the early nineties. When the train palled into Berlin, a chunky youth jumped aboard the coach and asked Clark if he might carry the cricket bag.

“Certainly, my boy,” said Clark, “and what’s your name?”

“William Lyon Mackenzie King,” said the youth. And that began a friendship that resulted in two generations of Clarks carrying the King bag.

Gregory Clark knew Mackenzie King from his own boyhood, interviewed him on countless occasions, visited Laurier House and Kingsmere, both on and off the record; and when the wartime Prime Minister flew by bomber to Britain in 1942, Gregory Clark, was one of the three newspapermen chosen to accompany him.

“It was the only time in his life,” says Greg, “that the old gentleman had both feet off the ground at the same time.”

The chances are better than good that Mackenzie King will be perceived by history as a figure of romance.

This suggestion may appear preposterous, even to those who saw in him most of the elements of greatness.

But history has an ironic way of brushing off the contemporaries of those whom history loves. And in Mackenzie King were those baffling elements of personality and performance which keep historians digging far deeper than the documents.

What they come up with in the next few years may be as romantic a story as can be found anywhere. It is this: that with his flesh and bones, and with his hours and days and months and years, he erected a monument dedicated to his rebel grandfather.

Right by the little elevator in Laurier House, up which he took you to the attic tower of his den, there is small framed handbill or poster. It is yellow with age. It offers a thousand pounds for the capture of the rebel, William Lyon Mackenzie.

Mackenzie King used to lead you to the elevator in such a way as to make it impossible to fail to see this curious memento. When you exclaimed upon it, he would give that awkward little twisted smile and wave you into the elevator.

Emerging into the tower room, you saw instantly, and to the exclusion of everything else, a lighted portrait. It glowed, as shrines glow. It was the well-known profile portrait of his mother, with an aura of misty white hair as she sits gazing with serenity into an unseen hearth, a book on her lap. The portrait was always lighted. It is probably lighted now.

When you had paid your respects to the portrait, you turned to find Mackenzie King at the desk shuffling papers; and when he raised his eyes, they had tempestuous expression characteristic of them at all times, save when he was meeting strangers or having his picture taken.

Thus you could not get into that attic den, in that old house that was more like a Madame Tussaud setting than a man’s home, without an impression of the past, and some ritual dedication to it.

Now, the stories a child hears in its awakening years sometimes shape its destiny. The stories Mackenzie King heard at his mother’s knee, he, bearing the name he did, must have been of a more gripping quality than most.

Here is one he heard – and it is on the record:

One hundred and thirteen years ago next December, William Lyon Mackenzie, the rebel leader, escaped over the border and immediately set about rousing American and refugee Canadian sympathizers to attempt raid back into Canada, with him at the head of it.

The Americans charged him with an offence against the peace and he was sent to prison for 18 months in Rochester. By the time he got out of jail, the enthusiasm of his friends had subsided, the little newspaper he was attempting to publish while in prison slowly perished and William Lyon Mackenzie faced his future a broken and penniless man.

His wife, children and 90-year-old Scottish mother were with him in Rochester. They lived in an anxious house, with doors barred with scantlings; and Mackenzie walked the streets cautiously. For there was still some thousands of dollars reward on his head, to which his Canadian political enemies from time to time added larger sums. And gangsters from Buffalo and adventurers from Canada were well aware of that handsome prize.

Amid all these desperations, a new baby was expected in the Mackenzie home. There were days, so the record stands, that they had not a scrap of food in the house.

The baby arrived.

“Mr. Mackenzie,” said the doctor, when he came out of the room, it is a girl, but I fear that, due to the privations and anxieties to which your wife has been subjected, it will not survive.”

“It will be God’s mercy,” said the broken rebel, “if she does not.”

But she did live. And she became the mother of a man who, in the time of the breaking of nations, throughout a period of earthquakes in the politics of the world, ruled the land his grandfather fled for 21 years as Prime Minister, headed his political party for close to 30 years, sat in the councils of nations as a statesman, laid as much as any man the foundations of the British Commonwealth, steadied the helm of his country through storms of unparalleled violence while its public opinion slowly and rationally accepted social and industrial reforms that place it amongst the most happily situated nations on earth.

From the earliest records of him, he was a dedicated man. He employed scholarship as the means to the end he had in view: and he ran up an impressive string of degrees at the universities of Toronto, Chicago and Harvard. He created and leaped into the first opening in public life when he became the youthful deputy minister of labor. Soon after, he ran for the House of Commons and was elected. When politics closed down on him for a few years, with the defeat of Laurier in 1911, he chose the field likeliest to increase his experience and powerful connections the Rockefeller Foundation. When he returned to politics, in 1919, it was as chosen leader of his party.

In all this time, he wanted nothing of life but employment leading towards his goal. They say he had not many friends. He had hosts: but the friendship was formal and did not intrude upon the dedication.

They say he was iron-handed with his cabinet colleagues and his secretaries: no more iron-handed than with himself.

It may well be that Mackenzie King belonged to history before he was born.

There are too many strange coincidences for it to be otherwise. In 1838, William Lyon Mackenzie called a secret congress in Rochester, NY “to be composed of Canadians, or persons connected with Canada, who are favorable to the attainment of its political independence, and the entire separation of its government from the political power of Great Britain.”

In 1926, that man’s grandson, the Prime Minister of Canada, went to the Imperial Conference at Westminster and threw into it the challenge of the Byng controversy1. He returned to Canada to inform his Parliament:

“I think it can be said there is no longer any possibility of doubt that the Governor-General is the representative of His Majesty the King and is in no way representative of the government of Great Britain or any department of that government.”

We cannot make history out of a couple of stories and a few instances. But the stories of dedication may now be told; and the instances, even in the short time since his death, are already coming to mind in the press all over the country.

In the process of serving his country with tireless devotion, many a great man has contrived to make himself into something of a monument.

Mackenzie King, with the light burning always over the lady born in exile and committed to God’s mercy by an irascible and broken old treasonist, did a job of sculpture with his life for somebody other than himself. That is evident in the way he downed mallet and chisel on his retirement from office and waited in utter silence for the end.

He was a romantic. His life was dedicated, probably from boyhood. That makes him easier to understand, more exciting to contemplate, now that he is safe in the clasp of history.


Editor’s Notes: William Lyon Mackenzie King died on July 22, 1950.

  1. The King-Byng Affair was a Canadian constitutional crisis that occurred in 1926, when the governor general of Canada, Lord Byng of Vimy, refused a request by the prime minister, William Lyon Mackenzie King, to dissolve parliament and call a general election. King’s government then sought at an imperial conference to redefine the role of the governor general as a personal representative of the sovereign in his Canadian council and not of the British government. The change was agreed to at the Imperial Conference of 1926. ↩︎

Familiar Characters on Toronto Streets – No. 4

Hughie Gallagher, the Yonge Street Flagman

By Gregory Clark, August 2, 1913.

Hughie Gallagher A Flagman For 26 Years

For a Dozen Years He Has Watched Yonge Street Crossing.

Born At Beaverton

Lost an Arm Years Ago – Not Afraid of Losing Job When Viaduct Comes.

Hughie Gallagher is the flagman1 at the Yonge street crossing. You see him as you cross the tracks to the Niagara boats and to the R.C.Y.C. dock. The photograph shows Hughie with his beard. In the summer he wears only a moustache, but the beard makes little difference, because of his eyes – twinkling and kind. You shout: “Hello, Hughie!” And you are answered by a wave of his flag and the glistening eye, as Shakespeare might say.

Gallagher was born near Beaverton. He was bitten by the railroad bug at an early age, and at eighteen years of age, in 1879, he was a brakeman on the Grand Trunk. The first year he was stringing together some box cars near Port Hope, and a coupling pinched his left arm off at the elbow.

“That was the end of my dream, just when I had reached the beginning of them. You can’t be much of a railroad man with one arm,” said Hughie.

So Hughie started on a long and dreary existence of signaling and flagging. For fourteen years he worked with his red cotton and his lantern in the yards at Port Hope.

For twelve years he has been on the Yonge street crossing, and in all those years, in spite of the danger of the spot, which receives so much attention from calamity howlers. he has never seen an accident on it.

“And I sneak a little credit to myself,” says Hughie, “because several times I have been in on some narrow squeaks.”

“Well, it’s a dangerous spot. But how about your job when the viaduct is built?”

“Oh, that ain’t worrying me none,” says Hughie. “I says to myself when I think of the viaduct, I says, ‘Hughie you have years of useful life ahead of you here.'”


Editor’s Notes: This is the forth in a series of pieces about people in Toronto when Greg was still new and had to write these filler stories. He often did “man-in-the-street” or stories about the poor at this time.

  1. A flagman directs rail traffic when there are people who could be on the tracks. Toronto Historic Maps shows that in 1913 the train tracks were near The Esplanade at Yonge Street, and you had to walk over them to get to the Harbour. The Viaduct is the elevated train bridge over Yonge Street that was built so a flagman at the location would not be needed anymore. ↩︎

Hot Jinx ~ ~ or Cold

July 31, 1926

Which Costs More ~ Keeping Cool or Keeping Warm

By Gregory Clark, July 31, 1926.

Which costs more – keeping cool or keeping warm?

Here we are shoveling out hard cash at furious rate in the vain effort to keep cool. In another fourteen weeks or so, we shall be shoveling coal.

Is winter more costly than summer? Heat costs money, whether we are trying to get it or trying to escape it.

“Ah, it’s lovely,” says Mrs. Fatt, as she fans herself in the discreet shadow of her verandah awning, “the money we save this time of year. No coal, no expensive winter clothing, no large winter dinners to prepare.”

“Yes,” says Mrs. Thynne. “It must be cheap living in Florida and other parts of the tropics.”

“I fancy,” says Mrs. Fatt, who is one of those straightforward talkers, “we must save a good deal from May to October.”

“I’m sure we do,” says Mrs. Thynne.

The ladies, of course, remember the furnace but forget the ice box. They remember the roast beef but forget the fruits in season. They recall the fur coats but overlook the dimity1.

Starting with the man on the street, his summer clothes are cheap. A light suit costs around $302. His light shoes can be as low as $4 or $5. His underwear is a cotton garment that can be got for $1. His straw hat is a good one for $2.

The same man in winter rig-out wears an overcoat that ran him not much less than $40. His suit is heavy worsted at $40, his boots are heavier, his felt hat ran him $5, his underwear was a bargain at $12 the suit. Then he has goloshes, neck scarf, two or three handkerchiefs in place of the purely ornamental doiley he wears in his breast pocket in summer; gloves. A man in winter carries around over a hundred and twenty-five dollars worth of clothes on him all the time, while in summer, less than fifty dollars covers him amply.

A dollar a day it takes to feed the furnace in the average eight-roomed house in winter. In summer, the cellar is the coolest place in the house. That is poetic justice. A ton of coal at $16 will last roughly two weeks. Ice, which costs from 15 to 25 cents a day, for those who have too much pride to keep their perishable foods, in the cool cellar, is no offset for the coal bill. For there are nearly six months that you have to burn some coal in the furnace, while there are only two and a half to three months that ice is absolutely an essential -though some folks keep their refrigerators iced all the year round.

On the other hand, the gas bill increases from May onward, after the furnace goes out, supplying hot water. The Consumers Gas Company says that the average bill would mount about $1.25 to $2 a month for the heating of water by gas after the end of the furnace season.

Eat More in Winter

Food, according to the dominion and provincial government Labor department figures on cost of living, does not vary greatly through the year. Eggs and butter swoop up and down across the seasons, but the staples, bread, meat, and vegetables, remain constant enough to keep the grocery bill pretty stationary fifty-two weeks of the year. We eat more in winter, unquestionably. All the restaurants say so.

“We cut our solid food dishes more than in half when summer comes,” says the manager of one of the city’s busiest dining places. “But the light stuff we prepare costs just as much as the solid food. So the check will be about the same year round.”

But if we eat more in winter, the cost of eating grows greater in summer because of the demand for fancy foods, fruit, salad, vegetables and fancy comestibles of all sorts. Ice cream, for example. Cantaloupe for two examples. The good old routine of beef and potatoes from November to April suddenly gives way to the maddest irregularity of exotic foods from afar, until by mid-summer, a man never knows what he is coming home to for supper. It may be a gorgeous salad containing head lettuce, radishes, cress, pepper grass, pimentoes, celery and fruit or it may be something soggy out of a can.

Fuel and clothing are two great departments of the family budget which demand many times the outlay in winter that they do in summer.

“Take a fur coat,” said the manager of the apparel department of one of Toronto’s big stores. “We have nothing to correspond in expense to the fur coat in our summer sales. Dresses run all the way from a couple of dollars for a little print frock to $300 for our most exclusive French creations. But there are thousands of $300 fur coats sold in winter for one $300 frock sold in summer. But there is this about it. A girl will be content with a very limited variety of costume in winter. She wears the one coat, the one suit and one or two dresses from November to Easter. Bu summer demands a great variety, three or four little dresses, with accompanying slips; blazers, sweaters, smocks, sport skirts, two or three pairs of shoes of different kinds, pumps, white shoes, formal shoes. Stockings can be limited in winter, but summer calls for half a dozen different pairs in varied shades.

“So you see, the summer clothing bill can creep up, almost imperceptibly.”

Creeping up imperceptibly is a beautiful phrase to describe the insidious spirit of spending which characterizes the summer season.

The summer vacation may be a two week one or it may be a summer cottage proposition. The house rent and expenses in the city keep right on while $200 to $300 has to be whacked out for rent of a very modest little summer cottage indeed. No end of cottages nowadays in Muskoka go as high as $700 and $800 for the summer.

While the family is nominally consuming its normal food supplies and wearing out summer clothes at the $300 summer cottages, Dad is home using the gas heater for his bath, electric light, paying either rent or mortgage interest on the city house, and eating downtown at a cost that cannot be less than $1.50 to $2.50 a day, unless he is one of those men of conscience who starve themselves that their dear ones may frolic into the great open spaces.

If the vacation is a two week family affair, then it takes the form either of a visit to a summer hotel or resort or motor trips. Either way, it costs money. It is a rare summer hotel that does not charge $30 a week per person. For two weeks, for a couple, bang goes $120, without a single mention of a single incidental. Railway fares, side trips, boat hire, would fetch the cost of the two weeks closer to $200.

Motor tripping looks cheap. All you have to do is put a lot of baggage on the running board and away we go. Gas, however, costs forty cents a gallon not far from the main highway. Hotels are no cheaper on rainy days than on fair, and the bill is the same even if you sneak up to a hotel in a motor car.

“The best part of a motor trip, anyway,” says a member of The Star Weekly staff, “is not the going but the stopping. And it is the stops, look you, that cost the money when you are moving.”

Does anybody spend $300 on Christmas? Yet there are tens of thousands of people in Ontario who pay $200 up for a summer cottage.

Do they give motor tires or grind your valves for Christmas? That’s the kind of present a fellow likes in August.

Doctor’s bills are much higher in winter than summer. But the visits of people to the corner drug store for bathing caps, face powder, ice cream and phonograph records are more numerous in summer than they are for pills in winter.

At first glance, the high cost of keeping warm appears to be greater than the cost of keeping cool. But the more you study the question, the greater the doubt that rises in your mind.

“I don’t think it is possible,” said an official of a government department whose job it is to compile colossal statistics, “to ever get to the bottom of such a question as this. There is a funny thing about budgets. If you study them, you will find that they never itemize human nature. They have fuel, clothing, food, etc., but they leave out the most important ingredient of all budgets.

“I think the truth of the matter is, human nature makes all the seasons kin. The average man spends all he has and a little more besides, whether it is January or August.”

Is it hot jinx – or cold?


Editor’s Note:

  1. Dimity is a sheer cotton fabric of plain weave in checks or stripes. I’m not sure of the context for the summer, perhaps for awnings that are placed on windows to reduce the heat? ↩︎
  2. I won’t bother calculating all of the prices in the article to modern values, but suffice it to say that $10 in 1926 is the equivalent of $178 in 2025. ↩︎

Page 1 of 12

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

"Greg and Jim"